The Impact Of Tourist Adoption And Acceptance Of Smart Phone Applications In Hospitality And Tourism Industry

The Impact of tourist adoption and acceptance of smart phone applications

Share this Article

Research Objectives

The aim of this study is to identify all the Impact of tourist adoption and acceptance of smartphone applications in hospitality and tourism industry as perceived by tourists for the successful ongoing of their tour.

 

Bio

Dr. Goldi Puri (M.B.A., P.G.D.C.A., PhD.) is an Associate Professor at the Institute of Hotel and Tourism Management (IHTM) in the Faculty of Management Sciences & Commerce. He is also the Vice President of Maharshi Dayanand University Teaching Association (MDUTA). Dr. Goldi Puri is an editorial board member and reviewer of various journals.

 

Abstract

Utilisation of Web, Cell phone and its applications has seen a gigantic development in neighborliness and the travel industry. In the present fast world individuals use cell phones not just for their everyday exercises rather they utilize cell phones for their excursion arranging exercises too. Presently numerous academicians additionally cantered their concentrate around shopper’s goal to take on the cell phone and other innovative progressions. The motivation behind this study is to distinguish the elements that influence the reception of cell phone and its applied applications. These variables were distinguished structure different recently utilized mechanical acknowledgment mode like Cap, IDT, SCT, UTAUT, UTAUT-2. The consequence of the review distinguished that Exhibition anticipation, Exertion hope, Social impact; Libertine inspiration and working with condition are the most important variables that influence the reception of cell phones by the buyers. Keywords: Smartphone adoption, Smartphone applications, Technology adoption,

 

Introduction

Innovation is moving exceptionally quick among the enterprises. The travel industry and accommodation industry is additionally developing quickly with the interference of data advances. Advancements have advanced toward portable and web 2.0 applications which are begun from market innovation and followed by applications. Today the greater part of the businesses needs assistance of shopper sites to play out all PR and advertising assignments to cover the clients all over the planet. The travel industry and neighborliness areas, which are interconnected with one another are widely benefit ICT frameworks. The most widely recognized utilization of ICT framework is to upgrade the correspondence between visit administrators, travel services and vacationers. Pretty much every vacationer place, inns, resorts, transportation and furthermore different partners of the travel industry and friendliness industry acknowledged ICT and, it turned into a perceptible piece of the business. These days, the transformation of e-the travel industry and the travel industry and friendliness exercises are developing quickly, for example, online development booking, flashpackers, sightseeing websites, e-local area experts and so on( (Khatri, 2019).

A Cell phone can be portrayed as a pocket/handheld cell phone with more grounded figuring capacities, bigger screens, solid Web access and area based help. The Cell phone has gotten a genuine insurgency the travel industry. Present day the travel industry establishments have adjusted to the new computerized time for the better administration and formative undertakings. The effectiveness of the use of Cell phones and their applications has propelled the clients to involve this gadget for all reasons including travel and the travel industry. Ease of use of Cell phones relies generally upon an admittance to Remote Web called Wi-Fi. Anyway there are disconnected applications accessible likewise which implies that the versatile application can be utilized when there is no Wi-Fi association accessible in the telephone. The Cell phone clients can get data around great many objections, occasions, cafés, inns, vehicle rentals and so on from only a single tick away by utilizing Google or Hurray devices of Cell phones.

Cell phones use, particularly ‘versatile applications’ has impacted regular daily existence as well as affects the travel industry and travel conduct of individuals. Current explorer improves their movement experience utilizing brilliant innovation (Karanasios et al., 2012) and to upgrade it, a wide assortment of cell phone applications are accessible across range of movement administrations

Versatile computerized applications (“applications” from this point forward), the center capability being used of cell phone, are There are various models/hypotheses accessible that clear up the purchaser’s expectation for the reception of innovation including Hypothesis of Contemplated Activity by Fishbein and Ajzen’s (1975), Innovation Acknowledged Model by Davis(1989), Hypothesis of Arranged Conduct by Ajzen(1991), Model of PC Use by Thompson et al.(1991), Advancement Dissemination Model by Moore and Benbasat(1991), Inspiration Model by Davis, Bagozzi and Warshaw(1992), Social Mental Hypothesis by Compeau and Higgins 1995. The point of this study is to recognize every one of the variables that influence the reception of cell phones and their applications to get all the necessary data for movement. Besides this concentrate likewise analyzes every one of the models connected with innovation reception particularly in the point of view of the travel industry and neighborliness industry. In this concentrate no new procedure or new hypothetical structure is embraced, this study is absolutely founded on writing survey.

 

Literature Review

Jennings and Weiler 2006 express that getting it, learning, and visiting the touristic places and the experience of rich culture established in such areas are the variables that are useful in the advancement of touristic experience. The spots that travelers visit and the way of life they experience there are connected with them by partners, including the travel industry specialist co-ops, vacationers, legislatures, and nearby networks and these partners with regards to the travel industry intervenes the vacationer experience in sure and negative habits through the portrayal of data. Local area expert is the best illustration of the go betweens in the travel industry. Cohen (1985) expressed that local area expert gives an intervention instrument to vacationers which joins voyagers with local people and furthermore deciphers the rich nearby culture to the travelers.

As per Leiper (1990), sightseers straightforwardly get data about their objective/ attractions by means of print media, for example, writing, magazines and through electronic media like film, television and recordings, which make due “vacationers look” by creating and reinforcing explorers’ expectation to travel places (Urry 1990). These days cell phone helps not just in essential travel courses of action like preparation, reservation, and route, however it additionally work on quite a large number “miniature minutes” and helps in inside movement exercises like – finding corner stores, figuring holding up season of rides, with an enormous scope of data administrations (D. Wang et al., 2011).

(D. Wang et al., 2012) broke down the traveler’s survey on utilization of cell phone and its related applications to know the intercession system of Cell phone applications in the development of vacationer’s insight. With the end goal of this study 202 positive audits were screened out of 37133 all out surveys are related with the main 100 most famous travel related Cell phone applications utilized by vacationer’s downloaded from Apple store. The finding of the review uncovers that moment data supplier system of Cell phone applications assisted the vacationer’s with managing unforeseen circumstances, and the sharing component of Cell phone applications are a portion of the variables that aided in the development of touristic experience.

 

Customer adoption and acceptance of Smartphone apps

(Jeon et al., 2018) led a concentrate on Client’s goals to distinguish the utilization of Cell phone applications for flight ticket appointments by utilizing the drawn out rendition of Brought together hypothesis of Acknowledgment and utilization of Innovation (UTAUT), client contribution, saw trust and client creativity were the extra factors to the first four factors of UTAUT model, the first four factors are execution hope, social impact, exertion hope and working with conditions. 369 respondents were chosen for the review from Korea who recently made enlistment for their flight tickets using Cell phone applications. The aftereffect of the review distinguishes that presentation an
ticipation, working with conditions, client creativity and saw trust are the elements that emphatically influence the client’s expectations to utilize the Cell phone applications for flight ticket appointments. Among every one of the elements execution anticipation is the most grounded factor among every one of the variables that outcomes in the figuring out client’s goals to utilize Cell phone applications for flight ticket appointments.

Cell phone are additionally utilized for amusement purposes. Travelers utilize cell phone and its united applications to acquire a few new encounters at vacation spots and these fills in as a moment useful help supplier to sightseers (Dorcic et al., 2018); (Gha[1]deri et al., 2019); (D. Wang et al., 2014). (Germann Molz, 2012) made sense of that cell phone associate vacationers with others while on visit. Besides cell phone gives a feeling of virtual closeness with the companions and family members of vacationer while on their outing. Sightseers use cell phone at the hour of sensation of forlornness and in the middle of between the exercises (Kirova and Vo, 2019); (D. Wang et al., 2014). Duffy (2019) inspected that constantly utilizing of cell phone by vacationers at traveler locations can either improve or ruin the generally touristic experience with the location and connectedness with local people.

“Partner in crime connectedness” signifies the fondness of common in the middle among sightseers and their movement partner (Misra et al., 2016). So that, there is an opportunity assuming sightseers and their movement partners are very much associated with one another, vacationers are not squandering their energy on cell phones and lessening some dreariness during the visit. At the point when a vacationer is com[1]monly associated with their movement partner, their excursion is bound to be fulfilled, and such sentiments might prompt generally speaking traveler fulfillment too (Wang and jiang, 2020). Nonetheless, sightseers are typically use cell phone during their excursion, in light of the fact that cell phones are habitually contemplated to be certainty by their purchasers (Hsiao, 2017).

Factors affecting adoption of smartphone applications in hospitality and tourism industry

S.NO. Factors References
1 Usefulness/ Performance
Expectanc
(Antunes & Amaro, 2016; Bakar et al., 2020; Development et
al., 2020; Dogra, 2017; Gupta et al., 2017; Y. Huang et al.,
2019; Im & Hancer, 2014; Jeon et al., 2018; D. Kim et al.,
2008; Management et al., 2019; Moro et al., 2018;No & Kim,
2013; Oh et al., 2009; Okumus & Bilgihan, 2014; Ozturk et
al., 2021; Regan & Chang, 2015; Rivera et al., 2015; Tan &
Lee, 2017; Verkasalo et al., 2010; T. Zhang et al., 2019) (Ho
et al., 2021; Martín & Herrero, 2012; Phaosathianphan &
Leelasantitham, 2019; Zhou et al,. 2021; Koenig-Lewis et al.,
2010; Ma & Peng, 2012; P ark & Chen, 2007)
2 Ease of Use (Antunes & Amaro, 2016; Ho et al., 2021; Y. C. Hu ang et al.,
2019; Im &Hancer, 2014;D. Kim et al., 2008; Lu et al., 2015;
Management et al., 2019; Martín & Herrero, 2012; Moro et
al., 2018; No & Kim, 2013; Okumus & Bilgihan, 2014;
Ozturk et al., 2021; Phaosathianphan & Leelasantitham,
2019; Regan & Cha ng, 2015; Tan & Lee, 2017; Yoon & Kim,
2014; T. Zhang et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2021 ;Boontarig et
al., 2012; Jyoti et al., 2014; Park & Chen, 2007)
3 Hedonic Motivation/
Perceived playfulness
(Antunes & Amaro, 2016; Dogra, 2017; Okumus & Bilgihan,
2014; Tan & Lee, 2017; Verkasalo et al., 2010; Yoon & Kim,
2014; T. Zhang et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2021 ;
Phaosathianphan & Leelasantitham, 201;9 Dorcic et al.,
2018;Ma & Peng, 2012; Pan et al., 2013)
4 Social Influence (Antunes & Ama ro, 2016; Bakar et al., 2020; Gupta et al.,
2017; Ho et al., 2021; No & Kim, 2013; Tan & Lee, 2017;
Okumus & Bilgihan, 2014; Jyoti et al., 2014; Ma & Peng,
2012; Pan et al., 2013)
5 Facilitating conditions (Bakar et al., 2020; Dogra, 2017; Jeon et al., 2018; Moro et
al., 2018; Ozturk et al., 2021; Tan & Lee, 2017 ; Ozturk et al.,
2021;Boontarig et al., 2012; Jyoti et al., 2014)
6 Habit/ Compatibility (13) (Dogra, 2017; Gupta et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2015 ; Meng et al.,
2015; Ozturk et al., 2021;Jyoti et al., 2014; Ma & Peng, 2012;
Pan et al., 2013; Koenig-Lewis et al., 2010)
7 perceived Trust (Development et al., 2020; Gupta et al., 2017; Jeon et al.,
2018; Phaosathianphan & Leelasantitham, 2019; T. Zhang et
al., 2019)
6 Customer Innovativeness (Jeon et al., 2018; Martín & Herrero, 2012; Meng et al., 2015;
Tan & Lee, 2017 ;Ma & Peng, 2012)

Since the improvement of Data Innovation, researchers created numerous hypothetical models connected with the reception and utilization of IT. In this concentrate every one of the major hypothetical models have been examined that have been created and changed by the explores throughout the time span to get a superior understanding of the client reception of utilizing a specific innovation. Ajzen and Fishbein in 1975 created Hypothesis of Contemplated Activity (TRA), there are two develops of this model Disposition and Abstract standards which are indicator of conduct aims. Demeanor characterized as a recommended conduct of positive or negative disposition after the outcomes of any activity. Abstract standards characterized as assessment of the person against any individual who thinks he/she ought to or shouldn’t play out some random way of behaving. Innovation Acknowledgment Model (Cap) created by Davis in 1989 got from Hypothesis of Contemplated Activity (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1975). There are two factors of Cap Apparent usability and Saw convenience. Davis characterized apparent usability as “how much an individual accepts that utilizing a specific framework would be liberated from exertion”. Seen handiness is characterized as “how much an individual accepts that utilizing a specific framework would upgrade their work execution”. It is utilized on broad level by numerous analysts to distinguish and make sense of the client conduct towards acknowledgment of new innovation. Hat is chiefly used to make sense of client’s aim for take on the cell phone reception by sightseers, reception of cell phone applications by travelers, web reception, internet business reception, reception and use of the travel industry sites.

Execution hope is one of the four significant builds of UTAUT model created by Venkatesh that characterized as a degree in which client of the innovation accepts that by utilizing a specific innovation would work on his general execution. Execution hope is comparative with different builds like apparent convenience a significant develop of Cap and DPTB model, work fit a huge build of MPCU, Result assumptions a valuable build of SCT, Relative benefit a significant build of IDT and Extraneous Inspiration which is exceptionally helpful develop of MM. Exertion anticipation is one more significant variable of UTAUT model. Seen convenience (Hat), Usability (IDT) and Intricacy (MPCU) are factors comparative with Exertion anticipation broadly utilized by the specialists distinguishing

the goal of buyer’s reception of cell phone innovation. Likewise, Social impact (ICT), Social elements (MPCU), and Abstract standards (TPB and DPTB) factors are comparative with Social impact variable of UTAUT model. Moreover Saw Similarity (IDT) and Saw Conduct Control (DPTB) are the root develops of Working with Condition variable of UTAUT model.

 

Conclusion

Since the improvement of ICT in cordiality and the travel industry, it plays had a key impact in the quickly creating, changing and developing this industry 11. As a feature of ICT, buyers access the Web using cell phone, tablets and versatile applications. Vacationers use web to get to the movement related data by utilizing their cell phones whenever and at anyplace. The majority of the sightseers are reserving their lodgings and buying carrier tickets through their cell phone 7. Not just ICTs engage buyers to recognize, modify and buy the travel industry items however they additionally support the globalization of the business by giving successful instruments to providers to create, make due, and circulate their contributions around the world (Buhalis, 1998) 82.

Presently the scholastic scientists center their examination around the reception of versatile innovation particularly with regards to neighborliness and the travel industry. Accordingly, this study audits the all around existing investigations on the variables influencing reception of cell phones by buyers. Factors were investigated from different mechanical reception models including IDT, SCT, TRA, Cap, UTAUT and UTAUT-2.

The aftereffect of the review uncovered that Presentation anticipation, Exertion hope, Social impact, Decadent inspiration and working with condition are the most important elements that influence the reception of cell phones by the customers. Execution anticipation viewed as one of the most grounded determinants of innovation reception among the clients followed by the work hope. After execution anticipation and exertion hope, Social impact and gluttonous inspiration are likewise other significant determinant influencing the reception. Aside from the previously mentioned determinants Saw trust, Propensity, and Client Imaginativeness are the significant variables not entirely settled in the before explores as critical elements influencing the reception of cell phone by clients.

 

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological bulletin, 82(2), 261.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and social psychology review, 6(2), 107-122.

Aldhaban, F., Daim, T. U., & Harmon, R. (2015, August). Exploring the adoption and use of the smartphone technology in emerging regions: a literature review and hypotheses development. In 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (pp. 2355-2370). IEEE.

Anderson, R. E., & Srinivasan, S. S. (2003). E‐satisfaction and e‐loyalty: A contingency framework. Psychology & marketing, 20(2), 123-138.

Antunes, A., & Amaro, S. (2016). Pilgrims ’ Acceptance of a Mobile App for the Camino de Santiago. https://-  doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2

Bakar, N. A., Alif, N., Nik, A., Maizana, N., Nawi, M., & Abdul, M. (2020). Travel Mobile Applications : the Use of Unified Acceptance Technology Model. February. https://- doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.B7661.019320

Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In Proceedings of the 43rd National Conference of the American Marketing Assocation, June 15, 16, 17, Chicago, Illinois, 1960. American Marketing Association.

Boontarig, W., Chutimaskul, W., Chongsuphajaisiddhi, V., & Papasratorn, B. (2012). Factors influencing the Thai elderly intention to use smartphone for e-Health services. SHUSER 2012 – 2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research, 479–483. https://doi.org/10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6268881

Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS quarterly, 399-426.

Chen, J. V., Yen, D. C., & Chen, K. (2009). The acceptance and diffusion of the innovative smart phone use: A case study of a delivery service company in logistics. Information and Management, 46(4), 241–248. https://- doi.org/10.1016/ j.im.2009.03.001+

Choudrie, J., Pheeraphuttharangkoon, S., Zamani, E., & Giaglis, G. (2014). Investigating the adoption and use of smartphones in the UK: a silver-surfers perspective.

Cohen, E. (1985). The tourist guide: The origins, structure and dynamics of a role. Annals of tourism research, 12(1), 5-29.

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.

Development, T., Awang, Z., Aziz, R. C., & Yusoff, A. M. (2020). Grab Pay App : The Factors Influencing Tourists ’ Behavioral Intention-to-Use. January.

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319.

Dogra, N. (2017). Tourist adoption of mapping apps : A utaut2 perspective of smart travelers Anil Gupta. 23(2), 145–161.

Dorcic, J., Komsic, J., & Markovic, S. (2018). Mobile technologies and applications towards smart tourism – state of the art. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-07-2017-0121

Duffy, A. (2019). Two-way street: How smartphones and the social web impact the traveller’s liminal gaze. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 60-75.

Ghaderi, Z., Hatamifar, P., Ghahramani, L., Ghaderi, Z., & Hatamifar, P. (2019). How smartphones enhance local tourism experiences ? 1665. https://- doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2019.1630456

Gretzel, U., Fesenmaier, D. R., Formica, S., & O’Leary, J. T. (2006). Searching for the future: Challenges faced by destination marketing organizations. Journal of Travel Research, 45(2), 116-126.

Gupta, A., Dogra, N., & George, B. (2017). What determines tourist adoption of smarthone apps? An analysis based on the UTAUT-2 framework. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology.

Ho, R. C., Amin, M., & Ali, F. (2021). Integrative model for the adoption of tour itineraries from smart travel apps. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 12, 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-09-2019-0112

Hsiao, K. (2017). Compulsive mobile application usage and technostress : the role of personality traits. 41(2), 272–295.
https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-03-2016-0091

Huang, Y. C., Chang, L. L., Yu, C. P., & Chen, J. (2019). Examining an extended technology acceptance model with experience construct on hotel consumers’ adoption of mobile applications. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 28(08), 1–24. https://- doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2019.1580172

Huang, Y., Chang, L. L., Yu, C., & Chen, J. (2019). Examining an extended technology acceptance model with experience construct on hotel consumers ’ adoption of mobile applications. 8623. https://- doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2019.1580172

Im, J. young, & Hancer, M. (2014). Shaping travelers ’ attitude toward travel mobile applications. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 177–193. https://- doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-11-2013-0036

Jennings, G., & Weiler, B. (2006). Mediating meaning: Perspectives on brokering quality tourist experiences. In Quality tourism experiences (pp. 75-96). Routledge.

Jeon, H., Ali, F., & Lee, S. (2018). Determinants of consumers ’ intentions to use smartphones apps for flight ticket bookings. The Service Industries Journal, 0(0), 1–18. https://- doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1437908

Jiang, J. J., Hsu, M. K., Klein, G., & Lin, B. (2000). E-commerce user behavior model: an empirical study. Human Systems Management, 19(4), 265-276.

Jyoti, C., Sutee, P., Efpraxia, Z., & George, G. (2014). Investigating the adoption and use of smartphones in the UK: A silver surfers perspective BT – 22nd European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2014, June 9, 2014 – June 11, 2014.

Karanasios, S., Burgess, S., & Sellitto, C. (2012). A classification of mobile tourism applications. In Global hospitality and tourism management technologies (pp. 165-177). IGI Global.

Khatri, I. (2019). Information Technology in Tourism & Hospitality Industry : A Review of Ten Years ’ Publications. 9, 74–87.

Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., & Lee, I. (2010). An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Computers in human behavior, 26(3), 310-322.

Kim, D., Park, J., & Morrison, A. M. (2008). A Model of Traveller Acceptance of Mobile Technology 1. 407, 393–407.

Kim, M., & Kim, J. Y. (2013). Antecedents and outcomes of attachment towards smartphone applications Chung K . Kim , Mina Jun *, Jeongsoo Han. 11(4), 393–411.

Kirova, V., & Vo, T. (2019). Information & Management Smartphone use during the leisure theme park visit experience : The role of contextual factors. Information & Management, 56(5), 742–753. https://- doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.11.008

Koenig-Lewis, N., Palmer, A., & Moll, A. (2010). Predicting young consumers’ take up of mobile banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 28(5), 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321011064917.

Leiper, N. (1990). Tourist attraction systems. Annals of tourism research, 17(3), 367-384.

Licoppe, C., & Heurtin, J. P. (2001). Managing one’s availability to telephone communication through mobile phones:
A French case study of the development dynamics of mobile phone use. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 5(2), 99-108.

Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS quarterly, 705-737.

Lin, J. C. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197–208. https://- doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00005-0

Ling, M., & Yuan, P. (2012, April). An empirical research: Consumer intention to use smartphone based on consumer innovativeness. In 2012 2nd international conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet) (pp. 2368-2371). IEEE.

Lu, J., Mao, Z., Wang, M., & Hu, L. (2015). Current Issues in Tourism Goodbye maps , hello apps ? Exploring the influential determinants of travel app adoption. July. https://- doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1043248

Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in human behavior, 21(6), 873-891.

Ma, L., & Peng, Y. (2012). Empirical research: Consumer intention to use smartphone based on consumer innovativeness. 2012 2nd International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks, CECNet 2012 – Proceedings, 2368–2371. https://doi.org/10.1109/CECNet.2012.6201892

Management, H., Chi, H., & City, M. (2019). ADOPTION OF MOBILE APPLICATIONS FOR IDENTIFYING TOURISM DESTINATIONS BY TRAVELLERS: 20(5), 860–877.

Mandrik, C. A., & Bao, Y. (2005). Exploring the concept and measurement of general risk aversion. ACR North American Advances.

Martín, H. S., & Herrero, Á. (2012). Influence of the user ’s psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: Integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework. Tourism Management, 33(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tourman.2011.04.003

Meng, B., Kim, M., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Users and Non-users of Smartphones for Travel: Differences in Factors Influencing the Adoption Decision Users and Non-users of Smartphones for Travel : Differences in Factors Influencing the Adoption Decision. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 1665(October). https://- doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2014.958508

Mills, J. E., & Morrison, A. M. (2003). Measuring Customer Satisfaction With Online Travel. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2003, June 2014. https://- doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6027-5

Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275-298.

Molz, J. G. (2012). Travel connections: Tourism, technology and togetherness in a mobile world. Routledge.

Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research, 2(3), 192-222.

Moro, S., Rita, P., & Oliveira, T. (2018). Mobile services adoption in a hospitality consumer context. 12(1), 143–158. https://- doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-04-2017-0041

No, E., & Kim, J. I. N. K. I. (2013). Determinants of the Adoption for Travel Information on Smartphone. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr

Nusair, K., Hua, N., Ozturk, A., & Butt, I. (2017). A theoretical framework of electronic word-of-mouth against the backdrop of social networking websites. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 34(5), 653-665.

Oh, S., Lehto, X. Y., & Park, J. (2009). Travelers ’ Intent to Use Mobile Technologies as a Function of Effort and Performance Expectancy. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, November 2014, 765–781. https://-doi.org/10.1080/19368620903235795

Okumus, B., & Bilgihan, A. (2014). Proposing a model to test smartphone users ’ intention to use smart applications when ordering food in restaurants. 5(1), 31–49. https://- doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-01-2013-0003

Ozturk, A. B., Wei, W., & Hua, N. (2021). Factors affecting attendees continued use of mobile event applications. 12(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-03-2020-0058

Pan, D., Chen, N., & Rau, P. L. P. (2013). The acceptance and adoption of smartphone use among Chinese College students. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8023(PART 1), 450–458. https://- doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39143-9_50

Park, Y., & Chen, J. V. (2007). Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 107(9), 1349–1365. https://- doi.org/10.1108/02635570710834009

Phaosathianphan, N., & Leelasantitham, A. (2019). Understanding the Adoption Factors Influence on the Use of Intelligent Travel Assistant ( ITA ) for Eco-Tourists : An Extension of the UTAUT. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(8), 1–26. https://- doi.org/10.1142/S0219877019500603.

Rathnam, G. (2005). Interaction effects of consumers’ product class knowledge and agent search strategy on consumer decision making in electronic commerce. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 35(4), 556-573.

Regan, M. O., & Chang, H. (2015). Smartphone Adoption amongst Chinese Youth during Leisure-based Tourism : Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of China Tourism Research,  September. https://- doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2015.1077181

Rivera, M., Gregory, A., & Cobos, L. (2015). Mobile application for the timeshare industry: The influence of technology experience, usefulness, and attitude on behavioral intentions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology.

Tan, G. W.-H., & Lee, V. H. (2017). Mobile applications in tourism : The Future of Tourism Industry? Industrial Management and Data Systems.

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS quarterly, 125-143.

Urry, J. (1990). Tourist gaze: travel, leisure and society. Tourist gaze: travel, leisure and society.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and use of Information Technology : Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

Verkasalo, H., López-nicolás, C., Molina-castillo, F. J., & Bouwman, H. (2010). Telematics and Informatics Analysis of users and non-users of smartphone applications. Telematics and Informatics, 27(3), 242–255.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2009.11.001

Wang, C. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of perceived value in Mobile Government continuance use: An
empirical research in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 140-147.

Wang, C. L., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Examining consumer affective goal pursuit in services: When affect directly influences satisfaction and when it does not. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.

Wang, D., Park, S., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2011). An Examination of Information Services and Smartphone Applications. 1–11.

Wang, D., Park, S., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2012). The role of smartphone in Mediating the Touristic Experience. December 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287511426341

Wang, D., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2013). Transforming the travel experience: The use of smartphones for travel. In Information and communication technologies in tourism 2013 (pp. 58-69). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Wang, D., Xiang, Z., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2014). Smartphone use in Everyday life and travel. May. https://- doi.org/10.1177/0047287514535847

Wang, H., & Wang, S. (2010). Predicting mobile hotel reservation adoption : Insight from a perceived value standpoint.
International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 598–608. https://- doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.11.001

Yenisey, M. M., Ozok, A. A., & Salvendy, G. (2005). Perceived security determinants in e-commerce among Turkish university students. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(4), 259-274.

Yoon, S. S., & Kim, J. (2014). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Examine the Intention to Use Tourism Applications on Smartphone.

Zhang, L., Zhu, J., & Liu, Q. (2012). A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1902–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.008

Zhang, T., Seo, S., & Ahn, J. A. (2019). Why hotel guests go mobile ? Examining motives of business and leisure travelers and leisure travelers. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 28(05), 1–24. https://-doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2019.1539936

Zhou, T., Song, Y., Zhou, P., & Zhou, T. (2021). Continued use intention of travel apps : from the perspective of control and motivation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 0(0), 1–14. https://- doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1916457

Dr. Goldi Puri

Professor, Institute of Hotel and Tourism Management (IHTM)

DOI

Upcoming GRC Conference at Harvard,
Boston, USA. 6th-8th December 2024

Join us on for an inspiring event that promises to foster collaboration and innovation in Generative AI: For a Green and Inclusive Future. Don’t miss this opportunity to connect with leading experts and fellow attendees in a vibrant academic setting!