This research delves into the synergy between the concepts of sustainability and resilience and their necessity across various aspects of human life.

Keywords:

Sustainability, Resilience, Adaptive governance, Circular economy, social cohesion

Bio

Dr. Rajkumar M. Kolhe’s journey from adversity to educational eminence is a testament to his resilience and dedication. Founder President of Jahnvis Multi Foundation, he established Vande Mataram Degree College and Jana Gana Mana School, providing quality education to underprivileged children in Nagpur’s rural areas. Additionally, he founded Jana Gana Mana Vidyamandir and Jr. College in Dombivli West and Jana Gana Mana Convent School Dawasa. With a Ph.D., NET, B.Ed., and multiple postgraduate degrees, including M.A. in English, Hindi, and History, his academic prowess forms the foundation of his career. Prin. Dr. Kolhe conducted over 200 webinars during lockdown, benefiting thousands, further cementing his legacy as a visionary educator and philanthropist.

Abstract

In today’s rapidly evolving world, integrating sustainability and resilience is crucial. This research delves into the synergy between these concepts and their necessity across various aspects of human life. Sustainability involves meeting current needs without jeopardising future generations, encompassing environmental, social, and economic dimensions for a balanced coexistence with nature. Resilience is the capacity to recover from adversity and adapt to changes, ensuring systems and communities remain functional despite challenges. The increasing threats of climate change, biodiversity loss, resource depletion, and socio-economic inequalities highlight the need for combined sustainability and resilience approaches. Effective integration recognises the interconnectedness of ecological, social, and economic systems, necessitating holistic thinking and long-term strategies. Key strategies include: 1) adopting adaptive governance for collaborative and inclusive decision-making; 2) investing in renewable energy, green infrastructure, and circular economies to minimise environmental impact and enhance resource efficiency; 3) strengthening social cohesion and equity to build social capital and collective resilience; 4) protecting ecosystem services and biodiversity to maintain natural capital; and 5) fostering innovation, research, and education for adaptive solutions. This integration fosters inclusive, equitable, and resilient communities, capable of navigating the uncertainties of a changing world. Collective action, transformative leadership, and continuous learning are essential to building a sustainable and resilient future for all.

Introduction

In today’s rapidly evolving global landscape, the concepts of sustainability and resilience have become central to addressing the multifaceted challenges we face. As the world grapples with environmental degradation, climate change, economic instability, and social inequities, integrating sustainability and resilience into our systems and practices is no longer optional—it is imperative.

Understanding Sustainability And Resilience

Sustainability refers to the ability to meet present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs. It encompasses the preservation of natural resources, the promotion of social equity, and the maintenance of economic stability. On the other hand, resilience is the capacity of a system—be it ecological, social, or financial— to absorb shocks, adapt to changing conditions, and continue to function effectively. In the context of a rapidly changing world, sustainability and resilience are crucial pillars for ensuring the longevity and well-being of human societies and the natural environment. Although closely related, they address different aspects of how ecological, social, or economic systems can endure and thrive over time.

Sustainability

Sustainability is the practice of meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It is a holistic approach that considers the long-term impacts of our actions on the environment, society, and the economy. Sustainability is often broken down into three interconnected dimensions:

1.Environmental Sustainability

Creating a supportive and in This involves the responsible management of natural resources, such as water, energy, and raw materials, to prevent depletion and degradation. It also encompasses efforts to reduce pollution, conserve biodiversity, and combat climate change.

2. Social Sustainability:

This dimension focuses on maintaining and improving the well-being of current and future generations. It includes promoting social equity, ensuring access to essential services like education and healthcare, and fostering inclusive communities.

3. Economic Sustainability:

Economic sustainability aims to create systems that support long-term economic growth without negatively impacting environmental and social aspects. This includes responsible business practices, fair trade, and the creation of jobs that contribute to a thriving economy while minimizing ecological footprints.

Resilience

Resilience refers to the capacity of a system to withstand and recover from adverse conditions, such as natural disasters, economic shocks, or social upheavals. A resilient system can adapt to change, absorb disruptions, and continue to function effectively. Resilience can be viewed through various lenses:

1. Ecological Resilience:

This is the ability of natural ecosystems to recover from disturbances, such as wildfires, floods, or climate change. Healthy, biodiverse ecosystems tend to be more resilient, as they can adapt to changes and regenerate after disruptions.

2. Social Resilience:

Social resilience refers to the capacity of communities and societies to cope with and recover from challenges such as economic downturns, political instability, or public health crises. Strong social networks, cultural traditions, and effective governance contribute to social resilience.

3. Economic Resilience:

Economic resilience is the ability of an economy to withstand shocks, such as financial crises or changes in global trade patterns and recover quickly. This includes diversifying economic activities, maintaining robust financial systems, and ensuring social safety nets for vulnerable populations.

Interrelation Between Sustainability And Resilience

While sustainability is about creating systems that are viable in the long term, resilience focuses on the ability to adapt and recover in the short term. However, these concepts are deeply interconnected. For example, a community that practices sustainable agriculture not only preserves its resources for future use but also enhances its resilience against food shortages caused by climate change.

Moreover, sustainable practices often build resilience by reducing vulnerability to shocks. For instance, renewable energy systems, such as solar and wind power, contribute to environmental sustainability by reducing carbon emissions while also enhancing resilience by providing decentralized, reliable energy sources that are less prone to disruptions.

Challenges In A Changing World

The world today is in a state of flux, characterised by rapid technological advancements, climate change, urbanisation, and global interconnectivity. These changes present significant challenges to achieving sustainability and resilience. For example, climate change poses a threat to food security, water availability, and human health, necessitating the development of resilient agricultural practices and sustainable water management strategies.

The 21st century presents a complex array of challenges that underscore the need for integrating sustainability and resilience into our global, national, and local systems. These challenges are multifaceted and often interconnected, making it imperative for governments, businesses, communities, and individuals to adapt and innovate in order to secure a viable future.

1. Climate Change

Perhaps the most pressing challenge of our time, climate change is reshaping ecosystems, economies, and societies. Rising global temperatures, melting polar ice, and increasingly severe weather events—such as hurricanes, droughts, and floods—threaten food security, water availability, and human health. Climate change exacerbates existing vulnerabilities, particularly in developing countries and among marginalised communities, and necessitates the urgent adoption of sustainable and resilient practices.

2. Environmental Degradation

Human activities, including deforestation, pollution, and overexploitation of natural resources, have led to significant environmental degradation. The loss of biodiversity, soil erosion, and the depletion of freshwater sources threaten the natural systems upon which life depends. This environmental degradation reduces the planet’s capacity to provide essential services, such as clean air and water, fertile soil for agriculture, and a stable climate, thereby compromising long-term sustainability and resilience.

3. Economic Instability

Globalisation has created an interconnected world economy, where economic crises in one region can have ripple effects across the globe. Financial instability, trade imbalances, and economic inequality are persistent challenges that can undermine both sustainability and resilience. The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, exposed the vulnerabilities of global supply chains and the unequal distribution of resources, leading to economic disruptions that have had lasting impacts on livelihoods and social cohesion.

4. Urbanisation

Rapid urbanisation is transforming societies and economies, with more than half of the world’s population now living in cities. While urban areas can drive economic growth and innovation, they also pose significant challenges, such as overcrowding, inadequate infrastructure, and increased demand for energy and resources. Urbanisation often leads to the expansion of informal settlements, where residents are particularly vulnerable to environmental hazards and lack access to basic services, undermining both sustainability and resilience.

5. Social Inequity And Inequality

Social inequities—based on factors such as race, gender, income, and geography—remain pervasive across the globe. These inequities contribute to disparities in access to resources, opportunities, and decision-making power. For example, marginalised communities often bear the brunt of environmental degradation and climate change impacts, while having the least capacity to adapt. Addressing social inequity is essential to building resilient and sustainable societies that can withstand and recover from various shocks.

6. Technological Disruption

While technology offers solutions for many of the world’s challenges, it also introduces new risks. The rapid pace of technological change, including the rise of artificial intelligence, automation, and digital platforms, can lead to job displacement, privacy concerns, and cybersecurity threats. Moreover, the digital divide—wherein some populations have limited access to technology—can exacerbate existing inequalities and hinder the ability of communities to adapt to changing circumstances.

7. Political Instability And Conflict

Political instability, often fueled by competition over scarce resources, economic disparities, and social tensions, poses significant challenges to sustainability and resilience. Conflicts can disrupt social cohesion, displace populations, and destroy infrastructure, making it difficult to achieve sustainable development goals. Additionally, political instability can hinder effective governance, making it challenging to implement policies that promote long-term sustainability and resilience.

8. Health Crises

Global health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have underscored the vulnerabilities of public health systems and the interdependence of global communities. The spread of infectious diseases can have wide-ranging impacts on economies, societies, and the environment, disrupting education, livelihoods, and social services. Building resilient health systems that can respond to and recover from such crises is essential for sustainable development.

Addressing The Challenges

Addressing these challenges requires a holistic and integrated approach. Policies and practices must be adaptive and inclusive, prioritising the needs of the most vulnerable while fostering innovation and collaboration across sectors. By embedding sustainability and resilience into the core of decision-making processes, societies can better navigate the uncertainties of a changing world and create a more equitable and sustainable future for all.

To effectively address the complex challenges of a changing world, it is essential to integrate sustainability and resilience across all levels of society—from local communities to global institutions. This integration requires a multi-faceted approach, involving adaptive governance, community engagement, technological innovation, and education. Below are key strategies for achieving this integration.

Strategies For Integration

1. Adaptive Governance:

Governments and institutions must adopt flexible, adaptive policies that can respond to emerging challenges. This includes incorporating sustainability and resilience principles into urban planning, disaster management, and economic development. Adaptive governance involves the creation of flexible, responsive policies that can evolve in response to changing conditions.

This approach is crucial for managing the uncertainties of climate change, economic shifts, and social transformations.

• Policy Integration: Sustainability and resilience should be embedded in all levels of policymaking, from local urban planning to national economic strategies. This involves integrating environmental, social, and economic considerations into decision-making processes.
• Collaborative Governance: Governments should engage multiple stakeholders, including businesses, civil society, and indigenous groups, in the policy-making process. This collaboration ensures that policies are inclusive and address the needs of diverse communities.
• Risk Management: Governments should adopt proactive risk management strategies that anticipate and mitigate potential disruptions. This includes developing early warning systems, disaster preparedness plans, and climate adaptation measures.

2. Community Engagement:

Empowering local communities to participate in decision-making processes ensures that sustainability and resilience initiatives are context-specific and culturally appropriate. Community-based approaches to natural resource management, for example, can enhance resilience by leveraging local knowledge and fostering a sense of ownership.

Communities are at the forefront of both the impacts of and responses to global challenges. Empowering communities to take an active role in sustainability and resilience initiatives is essential for creating effective and context-specific solutions.

Participatory Planning:

Involving community members in planning and decision-making processes ensures that initiatives are grounded in local knowledge and priorities. This can lead to more effective and sustainable outcomes.

• Capacity Building: Providing communities with the tools, knowledge, and resources they need to build resilience is crucial. This includes education and training on sustainable practices, as well as access to financial and technical support.
• Social Cohesion: Strengthening social networks and fostering a sense of community can enhance resilience by enabling collective action and mutual support during times of crisis.

3. Technology And Innovation:

Advancements in technology offer new opportunities to enhance sustainability and resilience. Renewable energy technologies, smart infrastructure, and data-driven decision-making tools can reduce environmental impacts and improve a system’s ability to withstand and recover from disruptions.

Technology plays a pivotal role in advancing sustainability and resilience. By leveraging new technologies, societies can reduce their environmental footprint, enhance their adaptive capacities, and build more resilient infrastructures.

Renewable Energy: Transitioning to renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, is a critical step toward sustainability. These energy sources are not only environmentally friendly but also enhance energy resilience by reducing dependence on fossil fuels.

• Smart Infrastructure: Investing in smart infrastructure—such as energy-efficient buildings, green transportation systems, and resilient water management systems— can reduce environmental impacts and improve the ability to withstand and recover from disruptions.
• Data-Driven Decision-Making: Utilising big data, artificial intelligence, and predictive analytics can enhance decision-making by providing real-time insights into potential risks and opportunities. These technologies can help optimise resource use, monitor environmental conditions, and improve disaster response efforts.

4. Education And Awareness:

Raising awareness and educating individuals and organisations about the importance of sustainability and resilience is crucial. This includes integrating these concepts into educational curricula and professional training programs to build a workforce that is equipped to tackle future challenges. Education is fundamental to building a culture of sustainability and resilience. By raising awareness and equipping individuals with the necessary skills, societies can foster a more informed and proactive citizenry.

• Curriculum Integration: Sustainability and resilience concepts should be integrated into educational curricula at all levels— from primary schools to universities. This ensures that future generations are equipped with the knowledge and skills needed to address global challenges.
• Public Awareness Campaigns: Governments, NGOs, and the private sector should collaborate on public awareness campaigns that highlight the importance of sustainable practices and resilient behaviours. These campaigns can encourage individuals to adopt more sustainable lifestyles and support resilience-building initiatives in their communities.
• Professional Development: Ongoing training and professional development programs are essential for equipping professionals in all sectors—such as urban planners, engineers, and healthcare workers—with the tools and knowledge they need to integrate sustainability and resilience into their work.

5. Financial Incentives And Support

Achieving sustainability and resilience often requires significant investments, which can be facilitated through targeted financial incentives and support mechanisms.

• Green Financing: Governments and financial institutions should promote green financing options, such as green bonds and sustainability-linked loans, to support projects that contribute to environmental sustainability and social resilience.
• Subsidies and Tax Incentives: Providing subsidies and tax incentives for businesses and individuals who adopt sustainable practices—such as installing renewable energy systems or implementing energy-efficient technologies—can accelerate the transition to a more sustainable and resilient economy.
• Insurance and Risk Transfer Mechanisms: Developing innovative insurance products and risk transfer mechanisms can help communities and businesses manage the financial impacts of climate-related disasters and other shocks. This can include microinsurance for vulnerable populations and catastrophe bonds for largescale risk management.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the integration of sustainability and resilience is essential for navigating the complexities of our changing world. Integrating sustainability and resilience is not just a goal; it is a necessity in our rapidly changing world. By adopting adaptive governance, engaging communities, leveraging technology, enhancing education, and providing financial incentives, we can build systems that are both sustainable and resilient and we can create systems that not only survive but thrive in the face of uncertainty. These strategies not only address current challenges but also prepare us to navigate future uncertainties, ensuring a thriving, equitable, and sustainable world for generations to come. Our collective efforts today will determine the well-being of future generations and the health of our planet.

Health, COVID-19 impact, resilience, workplace health promotion, sustainability-innovation-resilience, corporate social responsibility, megatrends.

Bio

Dr Michelle Nemec is from Sydney, Australia and she earned her PhD in educational psychology at the Australian Catholic University (ACU) Institute of Positive Psychology in Education as well as aa Juris Dr Law Degree and other postgraduate Masters degrees at the University of New South Wales. She is a member of the Faculty at Global Academy, an author and an inspiring and compelling Keynote speaker.

Abstract

This paper investigates the concept of resilience at personal, organisational and industry levels. The pandemic has made people feel vulnerable, out of control and repressed. Some industries have thrived and others hemorrhaged, needing to pivot and adapt to survive. Australia’s geographic isolation has acted as a buffer and a point of differentiation from many other countries but did not provide immunity. Individuals have emerged from the COVID-19 with a different mindset, changed expectations about what they want from work and a different outlook to life generally. Workplaces continue to be disrupted as worker sickness rates escalate, a phenomenon dubbed ‘quiet quitting’ takes hold as workers prioritise other parts of their life and the ‘Great Resignation’ decimates the intellectual and social capital within some teams and organisations.

To keep staff, companies need to adapt as workers have now placed a higher level of importance on their health and wellbeing and are looking for a sense of meaning in what they do as well as ways to feel connected and that they are giving back and multiple disciplines and argues that resilience at all levels, across disciplines and industries is required to thrive in the future. An industry-based model for sustainability, innovation, and resilience is examined to help industries respond to megatrends and future pandemics. Within this model, industries are called upon to enliven their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and career development for staff to support staff wellbeing, providing a path forward to a healthier approach to work and wellbeing.

Introduction

At every level of society, a state of  flux  has taken hold and with it uncertainty, rapid change and evolution, requiring a new approach to how individuals prioritise what is important in life and how corporations respond to their staff. In Australia, the relationship between resilience and vulnerability has been observed as the pandemic progressed, and physical, economic, social and environmental determinants of vulnerability have impacted individual’s resilience, mental health and wellbeing.  1United Nations 2004.

The pandemic has been noted to result in diminished mental health, particularly in individuals already predisposed to mental health issues and amongst individuals with less coping skills. At a community level, resilience and vulnerabilities can either protect individuals, or expose them to ongoing risks. Government and industry policies influence how pre existing vulnerabilities may be mitigated or exacerbated, and how new groups may develop vulnerability; thereby shaping how vulnerable communities are identified, the degree to which the vulnerable can flourish, or the degree to which newly or existing vulnerable communities become distressed in response to crisis.3

Resilience as a concept and skill-set

Resilience has been defined as, ‘bungee jumping through the pitfalls of life meaning the ability to overcome adversity and challenging life events. Resilience harnesses an array of skills and dispositions including perspective taking, conflict resolution, negotiation and self-regulatory skills. The preferred concept of resilience skills adopted in this paper is that in coping with adversity a person does not just return to their previous state, but rather, evolves to a new state made possible by ongoing reflection, learning and recursive personal growth.

The repertoire of social emotional skills involved in resilience draws on the science of positive psychology, meaning an individual levers their psychological assets to face the challenging situation. One of the recognised proponents of positive psychology, Martin Seligman (2011), has developed a theory of well-being as a construct of five measurable elements, referred to as PERMA: positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and achievement. Each element of PERMA needs to be harnessed to deal with the level of disarray experienced from the crisis of the pandemic. To have health, freedom and life as it is known suddenly ripped away requires a person to ‘pull out all the stops’ and focus on what can be controlled such as maintaining positive social connections via the use of technology, physical activity and maintaining quality sleep and nutritional approaches as well as maintaining key positive relationships.

2O’Connor et al., 2020

3Polonsky & Weber 2022

4Fuller 1998

5World Bank group 2014

Individual, community and corporate resilience

During the pandemic individuals had what they usually do not time and they practiced introspection and ran audits of what brings meaning to life. Governments developed ‘policy-on-the-run,’ and corporations were polarised with responses ranging from focusing on getting through the storm of the pandemic and just surviving, to trying to keep staff working and endeavouring to meet a burgeoning demand in those industries focused on e-commerce. There is no denying the deleterious impact that COVID-19 exerted on global capital markets. It was noted the severity of outbreaks correlated with an inverse relationship impacting stock markets and industry. However, an interesting parallel was developing. Just as individuals recoiled, so did corporations. The parallel to individual resilience became evident in organisations, as a framework reliant on the processes of preparation, perceiving and propelling were unveiled to address the challenge.

The business response which makes sense must involve a sense of urgency evident in the degree of responsiveness with which all industries must be ready to, adapt to, and take action. The pandemic is one crisis of numerous expected, constituting not only the continuation of future pandemics but also the result of megatrends such as climate change taking effect. Given these facts, resilience is a vital skill-set and way of responding to future challenges, requiring a multifaceted strategy inclusive of adaptability. (Walker et al., 2006) state: “resilience is the capacity of a system to experience shocks while retaining essentially the same function, structure, feedback, and therefore identity.” (Folke et al.,2010) define resilience as “[t] he capacity of a system to absorb disturbance and reorganize while undergoing change so as to still retain essentially the same function, structure and feedback, and therefore identity, that is, the capacity to change in order to maintain the same identity”.

Resilience as a term emerged in the 1970s in ecological science to explain how a system responds to and recovers from disruption (Holling, 1973). It has been appropriated across industries such as tourism where it fits neatly with sustainability as a conceptual model through to education and the application of psychology for staff and student wellbeing and systems thinking in ecology and the science-based industry (McCool et al., 2015), in technology and more generally all of the business sector (OECD, 2020). The resilience concept encompasses an inclusive and integrative “social ecological systems” approach which gives it a firm interdisciplinary underpinning in its application appropriated across industries. Resilience is a vital feature of complex, dynamic systems evident across disciplines including psychology (Fuller, 2003), economics (Arthur, 1999), ecology (Folke et al., 2002), pedology (Thurston, 2021), and network theory (Calloway et al., 2000) and sociology (Adger, 2000). No longer can organisations operate in silos and so adopting approaches to project management, restructures to implement new roles and ways of working to enhance durability and adaptability is necessary.

Today, the concept of resilience systems (SES), providing a theoretical underpinning towards developing new ways to address unstable and chaotic systems (Becken, 2013; Cochrane, 2010). The concept of resilience requires adaptive alternatives to address threats from a full range of natural or human induced crises and uncertainties, including those precipitated by frequent unpredictable events and longer term incremental hazards associated with climate and economic change. Resilience demands adaptability, flexible thinking and behaviour and systems thinking within the wider socioecological system (Cochrane, 2010; Lew, 2014). However, while resilience can be considered an attribute that mitigates uncertainty and unpredictability through the adoption of adaptive social and business practices, change must be considered through the SES lens (McCool, et al., 2015). Insufficient acknowledgement of deep complexity can lead to unexpected outcomes, resulting in “more problems, less resilience and to [the undermining of] developmental trajectories” (McCool et al., 2015).

New approaches to retain and develop staff

Changes to workplaces mandated by lockdowns, changes to workplace structures and ways of working including new hybrid models means flexible, staff-focused inclusive work environments have found their way into the mainstream. As more workers than ever before have resigned without new jobs to go to, opted for remote work and pushed back against employer demands corporations realise the status quo has altered and they need to adapt to retain and develop staff. Lack of opportunity has been cited as a major reason why staff resign and therefore a strategy gaining momentum is for companies to promote staff to more senior roles from within the organisation and to make it known that is the preferred approach. (7 Kairinos, 2022) This can act as a motivator for staff who want to advance themselves and develop their career.

Giving back, reciprocity (Fremeaur, 2011) and philanthropy can sound removed from the business world, but on the contrary, business organisations are a community (albeit profit making focussed) with a corporate social responsibility (CSR) by which they not only add value, but increase revenue. In return for good deeds, customers and clients want to support organisations that “do good” (Morgan, 2021; Baines, 2015) and the resulting increased business and positive reputation in the marketplace enables a “win-win” (Fisher & Ury, 1968). Psychologically, giving back, volunteering or supporting others can enhance staff’s sense of purpose and positive affect; thereby helping to retain staff and attracting talent (Haski-Leventhal et al., 2019).

Ethical values-based practices, acknowledging and rewarding staff and increasing employee’s engagement through creative work can support organisations‘ efforts to develop their staff and ensure they gain job satisfaction (Valentine, 2010). Therefore, the opportunity for staff to volunteer or give back to their community is significant by increasing engagement, reducing stress (Gallup, 2022) and providing a flexible as well as balanced workplace. CSR can, therefore, fulfill the purpose of a health promotion strategy when staff are involved in ways that add meaning to what they do and provide an increased locus of control.

Sustainability, innovation and resilience as interdependent and reflexive concepts

Alternatively, addressing the concepts of sustainability, innovation and resilience separately is remiss, as these concepts are interdependent and intersect in ways which need to be novel, creative and efficient, in order to rebound from the pandemic and make a difference to individuals and the planet of the future (Hargadon, 2015). The relationship is symbiotic in nature as well as reflexive, requiring each to mold and reshape as the others activate. The recursive and interactionist manner in which these three terms relate means that it will likely become more common in the future to refer to innovation as “sustainable innovation” or “eco-innovation.” This trend acknowledges that silo approaches to managing crises and people affected are being replaced by divergency and multidisciplinary approaches which draw together different interests.

The surge of activity to develop smarter ways of overcoming adversity also requires nimble analysis of impacts on the environment, individuals and the community. This necessitates drawing on less environmental resources, examining the health and wellbeing impacts. Moreover, an equally significant notion is that of replicating innovative endeavour at a sustainable pace (Hargadon, 2015). Historically, examples of corporations demonstrating a sense of social responsibility can be traced to the early 1800s when factories in Great Britain changed some conditions to improve the workers’ lives, aiming to increase their productivity (Riccio, 2019); thereby, acting resiliently.

Corporate social responsibilities were formalised in the 1970s evident in the statement; “business functions by public consent and its basic purpose is to serve constructively the needs of society —to the satisfaction of society” meaning organisations should take responsibility to contribute beyond goods and services (US Committee for Economic Development (CED), 1971) Today, social responsibility is an expected part of a corporate’s identity and is an important opportunity for increasing staff engagement and collegiality.

Globally, the pandemic, the slowing economy, and the war in the Ukraine activated a range of drivers affecting resilience themes. These events emphasised the need for resilience in unison with sustainability and innovation. For example, leveraging the resilience framework of “prepare, perceive and propel” entailed organisations building buffers by maintaining higher than usual stock supplies, creating scenarios and playing out second tier options and pivoting from rapid changes to strategic plans could each position companies more favourably in the marketplace. (Brande & Sternfels, 2022) Organisations not able to adapt vanished as the supply chain was negatively affected, staff availability was squeezed and gaps in skills emerged, fuel prices increased and travel halted. The World Economic forum (2022) research suggests that the impact of resilience (or lack of it) on annual GDP growth is 1 percent to 5 percent globally.

Major challenges which need to be addressed through sustainability- innovation-resilience are varied covering basic needs through to policy, institutional and legal reform. The basic needs include food, shelter, sanitation and health addressing inequity and making more ethically sound decisions. Food scarcity, poor living conditions and over population require attention as fewer of the world’s population demand more of its resources to supply particular foods including meat and fast foods. The degradation of the environment, climate change and the resultant impact on different species and the ecosystem, energy use and the choice of fuels (Fiksel, 2006) means industry is pressured to produce more with less.

Meanwhile, geopolitical pressure and conflicting ideological and international tensions need to be managed. Peace and security are paramount to safeguard development, economic and trade and international relations (Brundtland, 1987). These concerns are not dissimilar to the megatrends portrayed by the CSIRO in Figure 1 and bring to light the need to value the contribution that individuals of different backgrounds can contribute.

Conclusion

The flip side to any challenge is the opportunity it brings. Models of resilience evident at the personal level through adopting positive psychology and personal skills, through to how government policy impacts vulnerable communities or provides a buffer together with operating in ways that are sustainable-innovative-resilient herald in new ways of thinking and doing, as a powerful learning from the pandemic.

Levering CSR initiatives and strategies can provide one effective way to harness goodwill and make a difference both for the recipients and for the staff in corporations involved in the implementation, while addressing local through to global concerns. As the future unfolds, the ways in which resilience is appropriated across industries and workplaces will continue to provide a powerful lens and mechanism for making sense of experiences.

References

Adger, W. (2000). ‘Social and ecological resilience: are they related?’ Progress in Human Geography, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 347–364.

Arthur, W. (1999). ‘Complexity and the economy’, Science, vol. 284, no. 5411, pp. 107–109.

Becken, S. & Wilson, J. (2013). ‘The impacts of weather on tourist travel’, Tourism Geographies, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 620–639.

Baines, P. (2015). Doing Good by Doing Good why creating shared value is the key to powering business growth and innovation, John Wiley & Sons Australia, Melbourne.

Brande, B. and Sternfels, B. (2022). ‘Resilience for Sustainable Inclusive Growth’, MicKinsey & Co, [Online]. Available: https://www.mc kinse y.c om/business–functions/risk-and–resilience/our-insights/resilience-for- sustainable-inclusive-growth

Brundtland, G., (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427

Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, [Online]. Available: http://www.un-documents.net/our- common-future.pdf

Callaway, D., Newman, M., Strogatz, S. and Watts, D. (2000). ‘Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs’, Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 25, pp. 5468– 5479.

Cochrane, J. (2010). ‘The sphere of tourism resilience’, Tourism Recreation Research, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 173–185.

Fiksel, J. (2006). ‘Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach’, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 14-21.

Fisher, R. and Ury, W. (1968). Getting to Yes, Penguin Books, London.

Folke, C. Carpenter, S. Elmquist, T. Gunderson, L. Holling, C. and Walker, B. (2002). ‘Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations’, Ambio vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 437–440.

Fremeau, S. and Grant, M. (2011). ‘‘No Strings Attached’: Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business’, Journal of Business Ethics vol, 99, pp. 63–75.

Fuller, A. (1998). From Surviving to Thriving: promoting mental health in younger people ACER, Camberwell.

Gallop (2022). State of the Global Workplace 2022 Report, [Online]. Available: https://www.gallup.com/ workplace/349484/state-of-theglobal-workplace-2022-report.asp x?thank-you-report-form=1.

Guerra, N. Modecki, K. Cunningham, W., (2014).World Bank Group Developing Social-Emotional Skills for the Labor Market, The PRACTICE Model Social Protection and Labor Global Practice Group.

Hargadon, A. (2015). Sustainable Innovation – Build Your Company’s Capacity to Change the World, Stanford University Press, California, 1st Edition.

Haski-Leventhal, D., Kach, A., and Pourander, M. (2019). ‘Employee Need Satisfaction and Positive Workplace Outcomes: The Role of Corporate Volunteering’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 593–615.

Holling, C. S. (1973). ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems,’ Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, no 4, pp. 1–23.

Kairinos, N. (2022). ‘How to Prevent the Great Resignation’, ITNOW vol. 64 (2) pp. 12-

Lew, A. A. (2014). ‘Scale, change and resilience in community tourism planning’, Tourism Geographies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 14–22.

McCool, S. F., Freimund, W. A. and Breen, C. (2015). Benefiting from complexity thinking. In Worboys, G. L., Lockwood, M, Kothari, A., Feary, S., & Pulsford, I., (Eds.), Protected area governance and management pp. 291–326, ANU Press, Canberra.

Morgan, B. (2021). 20 Companies That Use Their Profits For Social Good October 26, [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ blakemorgan/2021/10/26/20- companies-that-use-their-profits-for- 27 social-good/?sh=1a175c8511a8

O’Connor, R. C., Wetherall, K., Cleare, S., Eschle, S., Drummond, J. and Ferguson, E. (2018). ‘Suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-harm: national prevalence study of young adults.’ British Journal of Psychiatry Open 4: pp. 142–148.

Masterton, V. (2022). ‘What is quiet quitting?,’ World Economic Forum September 2 [Online]. Available: https://www.weforum. org/agenda/2022/09/tiktok-quietquitting-explained/

Polonsky, M. and Weber, V. in Shultz, C J, Rahtz, D R, and Sirgy, J. M. Editors (2022). Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being Lessons from Multi-Country Analyses of Global Pandemic, Springer eBook.

Riccio, J. (2019). ‘How big tech is giving back to society,’ PwC Australia [Online]. Available: https://www.pwc.com.au/ digitalpulse/tech-philanthropyindustry-giving-back-society.html.

O’Connor, R. C. Wetherall, K. Cleare, S. McClelland, H. Melson, A. J. Niedzwiedz, C.L. O’Carroll, R. E. O’Connor, D. B. Platt, S. Scowcroft, E. Watson, B.Zortea, T. Ferguson, E. and Robb, K. A. (2020). ‘Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 Mental Health & Wellbeing study,’ British Journal of Psychiatry [Online]. Oct 21 pp. 1–8. Available: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC7684009/.

Shangzhi, Q. Jianing, J. Xinming, L. Ming-Hsiang, C. and Xina, Y. (2021). Can corporate social responsibility protect firm value during the COVID-19 pandemic?, International Journal of Hospitality vol. 93, Feb pp. 1-12.

Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish a visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing, Simon & Schuster, New York.

United Nations. (2004). Living with risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. In United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, United Nations.

US Committee for Economic Development (CED) (1991). Social Responsibilities of Business Organisations June 1991 [Online]. Available: https://www.ced.org/pdf/ Social_Responsibilities_of_Business_ Corporations.pdf.

Thurston, T. Lundstrom, K. and Gonzalez, C. (2021). Resilient Pedagogy. Pressbooks. [Online]. Available: https://oen.pressbooks. pub/resilientpedagogy/.

Valentine, S, Godkin, L, Fleischman, G, M. and Kidwell, R. (2011). ‘Corporate Ethical Values, Group Creativity, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: The Impact of Work Context on Work Response,’ Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 98, pp. 353–372.

Walker, B. H. Gunderson, L. H. Kinzig, A. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R. and Schultz, L. (2006). ‘A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems’, Ecology and Society, [Online]. vol. 11, no. 1, 13. Available: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art13/.